Charlottesville Albemarle Revenue Sharing Agreement

8 04 2021

According to the city`s budget, “most of this revenue goes to projects and measures that benefit the people of the city and the county.” Although the General Fund`s resources are not provided for specific projects, “it funds support for public safety departments, parks and recreation, and infrastructure maintenance,” Davidson said. He also noted that in recent years, RSA-funded IPC projects have included “repairs to steps and bridges, bicycle infrastructure, replacement of transit buses, renovation of parks and playgrounds, and development of green roads and roads.” It became the genesis of the revenue-sharing agreement, the question we thought we would get from readers, but not. We will take this opportunity to explain. The district attorney argued that the pilot is in fact unconstitutional because the city is responsible and therefore does not violate the RSA (which only prohibits legal taxation), but the statement raises more questions than it answers. “I was disappointed with the district attorney`s presentation,” Schrader said. “They`re always trying to justify the deal instead of attacking it.” The Annexation and Revenue Sharing Agreement is a legal agreement between the City of Charlottesville and Albemarle County in 1982, which prohibits the city from ringing county lands in exchange for a complex transfer of land tax revenue from the county to the city. The amount of the transfer is limited to 0.1% of the estimated value of real estate in the county and was completed annually prior to GJ2016. For the nominal dollar, the amount of transfers peaked at $18.5 million in 2011 and declined each year, with the exception of fiscal 2018, but virtually flat in terms of real dollar. The struggle continues on other fronts, but intermittently. Delegate Steve Landes, whose district is the western county of Albemarle, proposed a budget change earlier this year that ended Virginia`s revenue-sharing agreements if the annexation rights of a commune were restricted (as under the current moratorium). While this would have invalidated the Albemarle-Charlottesville RSA, there are more than a dozen other such agreements across the state, which may also have been affected by the change, so delegated countries have withdrawn the change and are considering trying a different approach in the near future.